Columbia University faces a whirlwind of controversy as janitors settle claims of being assaulted and held hostage by anti-Israel protesters, spotlighting broader concerns of antisemitism on campus.
Janitors Held Hostage in Protests
In a shocking incident during April 2024, Columbia University’s Hamilton Hall became the epicenter of heated demonstrations. Pro-Palestinian activists, fueled by rising tensions in the Israel-Gaza conflict, occupied the building. Two maintenance workers, Lester Wilson and Mario Torres, found themselves trapped in a nightmare as these protesters allegedly held them against their will. The workers were reportedly assaulted, called antisemitic slurs, and forced to clean swastikas, a grotesque symbol of hate.
Columbia University janitors settle case after being held hostage by anti-Israel rioters on campus https://t.co/6Ux5CRKIpy
— Fox News (@FoxNews) July 25, 2025
This occupation was part of a larger wave of unrest sweeping through college campuses, raising alarms about antisemitism and the safety of Jewish students and staff. The janitors did what any sensible individual would do—they fought back, filing a complaint with the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC). This move triggered a federal civil rights probe, thrusting Columbia University into the national spotlight.
Federal Government Steps In
The janitors’ ordeal is now intertwined with a monumental $220 million settlement between Columbia University and the federal government. The EEOC investigation uncovered broader civil rights violations and racially discriminatory practices at the institution. The settlement, described as the largest religious discrimination harassment settlement in EEOC history, includes $200 million dedicated to addressing discrimination claims and $20 million for employee civil rights violations.
While Columbia has settled with Wilson and Torres for an undisclosed sum, the spotlight remains on the institution’s handling of antisemitism and campus safety. The settlement terms include payouts to affected employees and policy reforms, making it a landmark case in university liability and protest management standards.
Ongoing Legal Battles
The saga doesn’t end here. Wilson and Torres continue their legal battle against 40 protesters, holding them accountable for the alleged assault and false imprisonment. The legal process against these individuals is ongoing in federal court, potentially setting further precedents regarding protester liability and employee safety. The janitors have returned to their posts at Columbia, yet the scars of their experience linger, both physically and psychologically.
This case serves as a stark warning to universities nationwide about managing campus protests and safeguarding civil rights. The federal government’s intervention underscores the importance of institutional accountability and the enforcement of civil rights on campuses. It’s a wake-up call for universities to balance free speech and protest rights with the imperative of campus safety.
Broader Implications and Reactions
The Columbia incident is more than just a local issue—it’s a microcosm of the larger debate over antisemitism, free speech, and institutional responsibility. The financial and reputational costs for Columbia are immediate, but the long-term implications could reshape how universities handle protest management and discrimination. Jewish organizations and civil rights groups largely support the settlements, viewing them as necessary corrective measures.
However, civil liberties advocates express concern about potential overreach that could suppress legitimate student activism. This case is a testament to the federal government’s role in enforcing civil rights, and it signals a potential shift in how universities address similar issues in the future.