A wave of leftist protests openly brandishing “Kings Get Guillotines” signs has ignited alarm among conservatives, exposing a new escalation in radical rhetoric targeting President Trump and his supporters.
Radical Rhetoric Takes Center Stage at “No Kings” Protests
In October 2025, leftist and progressive groups staged “No Kings” rallies in cities like Washington, D.C., Lansing, and Columbus. Protesters wielded signs reading “Kings Get Guillotines,” a direct nod to the violence of the French Revolution. The slogan, once reserved for historical debate, was repurposed as a threat against President Trump and other Republican officials. Conservative observers and lawmakers quickly condemned the displays, arguing the use of guillotine imagery is not only inflammatory but also undermines the principles of peaceful protest and civil discourse. The involvement of organizations such as the Communist Party and Marxist Movement further stoked fears about the radicalization of opposition voices.
The rallies unfolded amid a tense political climate, with the country still reeling from recent incidents of violence, including the assassination of a conservative commentator in September. Signs at Michigan protests called for violence against Republicans and federal immigration employees, while in Washington, D.C., demonstrators targeted Trump advisor Stephen Miller. The participation of Connecticut State Senator Saud Anwar (D), photographed holding a sign interpreted by critics as wishing for Trump’s death, added fuel to the controversy. These events were quickly amplified by viral posts and commentary from high-profile political figures and media personalities, raising questions about the boundaries of free speech and responsible activism.
Political Violence and Double Standards: Conservative Concerns Rise
Republican lawmakers and commentators reacted strongly to the protests, highlighting what they see as a dangerous double standard in the treatment of political violence. U.S. Rep. Nicole Malliotakis (R-NY) and Senator Aric Nesbitt (R-MI) publicly condemned the rallies, emphasizing the hypocrisy of leftist groups who previously criticized Trump for what they called authoritarian rhetoric. Conservative media outlets framed the story as proof of escalating intolerance from the left, pointing to the involvement of elected Democrats and claims of organized support from far-left groups. The debate over the meaning and impact of the “guillotine” metaphor remains fierce, with critics arguing that such language normalizes violence and erodes trust in American institutions.
Despite widespread outrage among conservatives, there has been no indication of legal action against protesters or organizers. Democratic participants have largely remained silent, focusing attention instead on social media posts and images from the events. Media analysis continues to dissect the implications for U.S. democracy and political discourse, with some experts warning that the normalization of violent rhetoric could have long-term consequences for the nation’s stability and the safety of public figures. The protests have become a flashpoint in the broader debate over political violence, polarization, and the limits of acceptable protest in a democratic society.
Social Media Amplifies Division and Fuels Debate
The “No Kings” rallies gained significant traction through social media platforms, where images of protest signs and participant statements were shared widely. Influential accounts and commentators helped shape public perception, driving engagement and sharpening partisan divides. The amplification of controversial content underscored the power of digital media in spreading radical messages and mobilizing supporters on both sides. As the fallout continues, concerns grow about the ability of social media to moderate extremist rhetoric without infringing on free speech—a challenge that remains unresolved in the wake of these events.
Democrats just brought a guillotine while protesting President Trump and Republicans at the Arizona State Capitol
Democrats are the party of hate
Democrats are the party of division
Democrats are the party of violence pic.twitter.com/Wcc51LXNFu
— Nico Delgado 🇺🇸 (@NicoDelgadoAZ) October 18, 2025
Experts in political science and media studies caution that the use of violent historical metaphors in contemporary protests sets a dangerous precedent. The involvement of elected officials blurs the line between legitimate dissent and incitement, prompting calls for renewed emphasis on civil discourse and respect for democratic norms. While left-leaning commentators may frame the protests as a response to perceived authoritarianism, conservative voices warn of the growing threat to constitutional values, family stability, and public safety. The events of October 2025 serve as a stark reminder of the risks posed by radical activism and the importance of safeguarding American principles in turbulent times.
Sources:
‘Kings Get Guillotines’: Leftists Show Out Threatening Trump
Free Republic – ‘Kings Get Guillotines’: Leftists Show Out Threatening Trump
Free Republic – ‘Kings Get Guillotines’: Leftists Show Out Threatening Trump (page 40)
Instapundit – ‘Kings Get Guillotines’: Leftists Show Out Threatening Trump