A group of prominent internet influencers has sparked widespread condemnation after a video surfaced showing them celebrating while listening to a banned song with antisemitic lyrics. The footage, which has garnered millions of views across social media platforms, shows Andrew Tate, Nick Fuentes, and several other controversial content creators aboard a luxury bus en route to a Miami nightclub.
The 73-second clip captures the men singing along to lyrics from a prohibited track that references Adolf Hitler while making gestures that appear to mimic Nazi salutes. The video has reignited discussions about the influence of extremist content creators and their reach among younger audiences.
Video Details and Participants
The viral footage shows a gathering of several high-profile internet personalities, including brothers Andrew and Tristan Tate, white nationalist Nick Fuentes, and content creators known by their online handles Sneako, Clavicular, Myron Gaines, and Justin Waller. The group was filmed inside what appears to be a chartered bus with luxury leather seating, drinks in hand, as they traveled through Miami.
According to reports, the men specifically requested that the nightclub play the same controversial song upon their arrival. The video shows them continuing their animated behavior as they exit the vehicle and enter the establishment.
Nazis doing nazi things👀
Nick Fuentes, Sneako, Clavicular, and Andrew Tate were at a Miami nightclub where Ye’s song “Heil Hitler” was played at their request. pic.twitter.com/Y7IrMAlhje
— Mario (@PawlowskiMario) January 18, 2026
The combined social media following of these individuals exceeds 15 million users, with their content reaching tens of millions of people monthly across various platforms. This substantial reach has amplified concerns about the normalization of extremist messaging among impressionable audiences.
Public Response and Criticism
The video has generated significant backlash from users across social media platforms, with many expressing disgust and concern over the display. Critics have characterized the behavior as both juvenile and dangerous, noting the potential influence these personalities wield over their substantial follower bases.
Social media users have described the content as “sinister” and expressed worry about the broader implications of such behavior being broadcast to millions of followers. Some commenters have suggested that this incident could represent a turning point that might undermine the credibility of this particular sphere of internet influence.
The reaction has been particularly sharp given that several of the individuals in the video have previously been associated with antisemitic statements and controversial political positions. Many observers noted that while the behavior might not be surprising given their track records, it represents a particularly brazen public display of extremist sympathies.
Background on the Controversial Song
The audio featured in the video comes from a track released in May 2025 by the artist formerly known as Kanye West, who now goes by Ye. The song was swiftly removed from major streaming platforms, including Spotify, YouTube, and Amazon Music, due to its explicit antisemitic content and glorification of Nazi ideology.
This is not the first time the banned track has appeared in content associated with these personalities. Following recent legal developments involving the Tate brothers and sex trafficking charges in Romania, Andrew Tate previously posted content featuring the same song in the background.
The widespread availability and sharing of such content, despite official bans from major platforms, highlights ongoing challenges in content moderation and the persistence of extremist material in digital spaces.
Context of Recent Political Developments
The video’s emergence comes amid a complex political landscape where several of these personalities have seen their legal situations change. The Tate brothers recently avoided prosecution on serious charges in Romania, a development that some observers have linked to shifting political dynamics following the 2024 election cycle.
Nick Fuentes, meanwhile, has maintained his position as a prominent figure in white nationalist circles, despite periodic attempts by social media platforms to limit his reach. His inclusion in this gathering alongside other controversial figures represents a convergence of different streams of extremist and misogynistic online content.
Broader Implications for Online Influence
The incident raises questions about the effectiveness of content moderation efforts and the ability of controversial figures to maintain substantial audiences despite promoting extremist viewpoints. The collective reach of the individuals involved demonstrates how alternative media ecosystems can amplify fringe ideologies to mainstream audiences.
Digital rights experts have noted that while platforms have made efforts to restrict extremist content, the decentralized nature of modern social media allows controversial figures to maintain influence across multiple channels. The viral nature of this particular video illustrates how shocking content can achieve widespread distribution even when it violates platform policies.
The gathering also represents a physical convergence of online personalities who typically operate in separate but overlapping spheres of influence. This collaboration between figures known for misogynistic content, white nationalism, and general controversy suggests a potential consolidation of extremist messaging strategies.
Response from Platforms and Authorities
As of this writing, major social media platforms have not issued official statements regarding their response to the video’s circulation. However, the content appears to remain available on several platforms despite clear violations of terms of service related to hate speech and extremist content.
The incident occurs against a backdrop of ongoing debates about free speech, content moderation, and the responsibility of platforms to prevent the spread of extremist ideologies. Critics argue that inconsistent enforcement of community standards allows dangerous content to flourish and reach vulnerable audiences.
Legal experts note that while the behavior shown in the video may be protected as free speech under U.S. law, private platforms retain the authority to remove content that violates their terms of service. The continued availability of such material raises questions about enforcement priorities and resources.
Looking Forward
The viral video represents a significant moment in the ongoing evolution of extremist content online. As these personalities continue to command substantial audiences, their willingness to openly celebrate antisemitic material signals a potential escalation in the normalization of hate speech within certain online communities.
The incident serves as a reminder of the ongoing challenges posed by the intersection of social media influence, extremist ideology, and the global reach of digital platforms. As authorities and platforms grapple with these issues, the real-world impact of online radicalization remains a pressing concern for communities across the United States and beyond.