Immigration and Customs Enforcement has identified the agent involved in the deadly shooting of 37-year-old Renee Nicole Good as Jonathan Ross, a veteran officer with the federal agency. The identification comes amid mounting scrutiny over the circumstances surrounding Good’s death during what authorities describe as an immigration enforcement operation in Minneapolis.
According to federal sources familiar with the case, Ross has served as an ICE agent for several years and was previously injured in the line of duty. An FBI official, speaking on condition of anonymity, confirmed that Ross sustained significant injuries in June 2025 while attempting to apprehend a suspect described as an undocumented immigrant with a criminal record.
“He’s the same ICE agent who got dragged by a car 50 feet back in June, so he has a history,” the federal source told reporters, referring to the previous incident that left Ross with what have been described as serious injuries.
Background of the Shooting Incident
The fatal encounter occurred during what ICE officials characterize as a routine enforcement operation. Good, who was reportedly present at the scene, was struck by gunfire from Ross’s weapon. The circumstances leading to the discharge of the firearm remain under investigation by multiple agencies, including the FBI and local Minneapolis authorities.
Federal investigators are examining whether the shooting was justified under ICE protocols and federal law enforcement guidelines. The incident has drawn attention to the agency’s use-of-force policies and the increasing tensions surrounding immigration enforcement operations in urban areas.
Good’s death has prompted calls for transparency from civil rights organizations and community advocates who are demanding a thorough investigation into the circumstances surrounding the shooting. The case has also reignited debates about federal immigration enforcement tactics and officer accountability.
Agent Ross’s Service Record
Ross’s previous injury in June 2025 occurred during an arrest operation targeting an individual with outstanding warrants related to sexual offenses. During that incident, Ross was reportedly dragged approximately 50 feet by a vehicle while attempting to prevent the suspect’s escape, resulting in injuries that required medical treatment and time away from active duty.
The previous incident appears to have left Ross with what sources describe as lasting effects, though specific details about his physical or psychological condition following the June encounter have not been publicly disclosed. Federal employee medical records and fitness-for-duty evaluations are typically confidential under privacy regulations.
ICE officials have not commented on whether Ross underwent any specialized training or counseling following his June 2025 injuries or whether his medical clearance to return to active duty involved a psychological evaluation. Such protocols are standard in many federal law enforcement agencies following traumatic incidents.
Investigation and Legal Proceedings
Multiple agencies are conducting parallel investigations into the shooting, including the FBI’s Civil Rights Division, which examines potential federal civil rights violations in officer-involved shootings. Local Minneapolis authorities are also conducting their own review of the incident under Minnesota state law.
The investigation will likely examine Ross’s training records, his psychological fitness for duty, and whether proper protocols were followed during the enforcement operation. Federal investigators will also review body camera footage, witness statements, and forensic evidence from the scene.
Legal experts note that federal agents face different legal standards than local police officers, operating under federal statutes that govern the use of deadly force. The investigation must determine whether Ross’s actions met the federal threshold for justified use of force under the circumstances he encountered.
Community Response and Political Implications
The identification of Ross has intensified community demands for accountability and transparency in federal immigration enforcement operations. Minneapolis has been a focal point for immigration policy debates, particularly regarding sanctuary city policies and federal enforcement activities.
Civil rights organizations are calling for immediate reforms to ICE protocols and enhanced oversight of agents who have been involved in previous traumatic incidents. They argue that officers who have sustained significant injuries in the line of duty should undergo a comprehensive evaluation before returning to high-stress enforcement operations.
The case has also drawn attention from congressional lawmakers who oversee immigration policy and federal law enforcement agencies. Several members of Congress have indicated they may request briefings on ICE training protocols and officer wellness programs.
Broader Context of Federal Immigration Enforcement
The shooting occurs against the backdrop of ongoing national debates about immigration enforcement policies and the militarization of federal immigration operations. Critics argue that ICE operations have become increasingly aggressive, while supporters maintain that agents face dangerous situations requiring robust enforcement authority.
Recent data shows that ICE agents have been involved in an increasing number of use-of-force incidents, though comprehensive statistics on agent-involved shootings are not regularly published by the Department of Homeland Security. The agency has faced criticism for limited transparency regarding officer-involved incidents and disciplinary actions.
Federal law enforcement experts note that immigration enforcement has become increasingly complex, with agents often operating in hostile environments where they may encounter armed resistance. However, they emphasize that proper training, psychological support, and oversight remain essential for maintaining public trust and officer safety.
Next Steps in the Investigation
The investigation into Good’s death is expected to continue for several months as federal and local authorities examine all aspects of the incident. The findings will likely influence future ICE training protocols and may result in policy changes regarding officer wellness and fitness-for-duty evaluations.
Ross’s employment status with ICE remains unclear, as the agency typically places agents involved in shootings on administrative leave pending investigation outcomes. The results of the investigation could determine whether criminal charges are filed or administrative action is taken.
The case represents a significant test for federal immigration enforcement oversight and may establish precedents for how agencies handle officers who return to duty following traumatic incidents. The outcome will be closely watched by law enforcement agencies, civil rights organizations, and communities affected by federal immigration enforcement operations.