One angry voicemail from a city commission candidate didn’t just break the rules of political discourse—it shattered the line between protest and intimidation, exposing the raw nerve of American politics in 2025.
Listen the video below.
Threats Cross a Political Rubicon in Helena, Montana
On the eve of a local election, a voicemail from Haley McKnight—once a little-known city commission candidate in Helena—rocketed her into the national spotlight. She wasn’t celebrating a campaign milestone or unveiling a bold new vision for her city.
Instead, she unleashed a tirade of personal attacks and death wishes on Sen. Tim Sheehy, Montana’s Republican senator, after his vote for the “One Big Beautiful Bill Act.” Her explicit message, including the hope that Sheehy would “get pancreatic cancer” and die quickly, didn’t just air frustration; it crossed the line into the realm of threats, and Sheehy’s office didn’t hesitate to release it to the world.
https://twitter.com/atensnut/status/1985503259717411285
The voicemail was quickly authenticated by multiple media outlets. Its tone was so unhinged, and its timing so close to the election, that it stunned even seasoned observers of political mudslinging.
McKnight’s words, teetering between protest and incitement, became a lightning rod for debates over free speech, responsible dissent, and the growing dangers faced by public figures. Sheehy’s team, seizing the moment, framed the incident as proof of an escalating climate of intimidation targeting conservative officials. McKnight, meanwhile, claimed her own safety and business were now at risk, casting herself as a victim of political retaliation.
Montana’s Partisan Divide Mirrors the Nation’s Anger
Montana, once a bastion of neighborly politics, has become a microcosm for America’s deepening partisan divide. The passage of the Republican-led spending bill, which Sheehy supported, ignited fury among progressives already seething from the national climate.
McKnight’s voicemail wasn’t an isolated outburst—it was the latest escalation in a year marked by growing hostility, protests, and threats against lawmakers. Sen. Thom Tillis of North Carolina had recently faced a similar barrage, with his office fielding a disturbing number of death threats from political opponents. These increasingly frequent incidents have forced staffers to work remotely and triggered a national conversation about the safety of public officials and the health of American democracy.
Sheehy’s office, by releasing the voicemail, aimed to expose the real and present danger facing politicians. The media—local and national—verified the message and amplified the story, thrusting McKnight’s candidacy into turmoil just as voters prepared to cast their ballots. The explicit nature of McKnight’s threats, coupled with her status as a declared candidate, set this incident apart from routine political harassment. It wasn’t just another angry constituent venting on social media; it was a potential future city leader publicly wishing death on a sitting senator.
Voicemail Fallout: Escalation, Defiance, and a Chilling Effect
In the aftermath, McKnight defended her remarks as justified outrage, citing personal struggles and losses under GOP healthcare policies. Her response, delivered to both the media and supporters, framed the voicemail as a “politically motivated protest” and dismissed the timing of its release as a “cheap shot the night before an election.” Sheehy’s camp stood firm, arguing that Americans needed to see the corrosive effects of unchecked political rage. For McKnight’s campaign, the fallout was immediate: intense scrutiny from voters, local party officials, and the press, as well as threats directed at her own business—a claim not independently confirmed by the media.
The broader implications extend far beyond Helena. Political analysts warn that this cycle of threat and exposure has a dangerous chilling effect, discouraging good people from seeking office and normalizing extreme rhetoric as part of the democratic process. Communications experts point to the media’s role in amplifying such incidents, fueling a feedback loop of outrage and escalation. Law enforcement and security professionals, meanwhile, quietly adjust their protocols as threats become more frequent and more personal.
Where Does the Line Get Drawn?
As McKnight’s candidacy hangs in the balance, the real story is what her voicemail reveals about the state of American politics. The lines between protest, outrage, intimidation, and incitement have blurred. Public officials—regardless of party—now face a daily barrage of threats that would have been unthinkable a decade ago. The normalization of this hostility erodes civil discourse, undermines public trust, and threatens to leave only the most hardened or reckless individuals willing to serve. Voters, party leaders, and the media must now grapple with a difficult question: Where does passionate dissent end and dangerous intimidation begin?
The incident in Helena is more than a local scandal. It is a warning sign—a glimpse into the darker undercurrents of American civic life, where the stakes of every vote, every bill, and every public statement can spiral into personal peril. As the nation watches, one voicemail lingers as both symptom and symbol of a democracy at the crossroads.
Sources:
WUNC: Tillis office releases audio of more threatening calls
Fox News: Hear death threats Republican senator received about Trump
Fox News: Unhinged voicemail exposes left-wing candidate’s death threats against GOP senator